Does it really matter where you look when walking on stairs? Insights from a dual-task study

dc.contributor.authorMiyasike-daSilva, Veronica
dc.contributor.authorMcIlroy, William E.
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-18T13:35:29Z
dc.date.available2026-06-18T13:35:29Z
dc.date.issued2012-09-06
dc.description© Miyasike-daSilva, McIlroy. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
dc.description.abstractAlthough the visual system is known to provide relevant information to guide stair locomotion, there is less understanding of the specific contributions of foveal and peripheral visual field information. The present study investigated the specific role of foveal vision during stair locomotion and ground-stairs transitions by using a dual-task paradigm to influence the ability to rely on foveal vision. Fifteen healthy adults (26.9±3.3 years; 8 females) ascended a 7-step staircase under four conditions: no secondary tasks (CONTROL); gaze fixation on a fixed target located at the end of the pathway (TARGET); visual reaction time task (VRT); and auditory reaction time task (ART). Gaze fixations towards stair features were significantly reduced in TARGET and VRT compared to CONTROL and ART. Despite the reduced fixations, participants were able to successfully ascend stairs and rarely used the handrail. Step time was increased during VRT compared to CONTROL in most stair steps. Navigating on the transition steps did not require more gaze fixations than the middle steps. However, reaction time tended to increase during locomotion on transitions suggesting additional executive demands during this phase. These findings suggest that foveal vision may not be an essential source of visual information regarding stair features to guide stair walking, despite the unique control challenges at transition phases as highlighted by phase-specific challenges in dual-tasking. Instead, the tendency to look at the steps in usual conditions likely provides a stable reference frame for extraction of visual information regarding step features from the entire visual field.
dc.description.sponsorshipNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) || CAPES Foundation, Ministry of Education of Brazil.
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044722
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10012/23639
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPLoS ONE; 7(9); e44722
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectwalking
dc.subjectreaction time
dc.subjectattention
dc.subjectbiological locomotion
dc.subjectvision
dc.subjectanalysis of variance
dc.subjecteye movements
dc.subjectvisual system
dc.titleDoes it really matter where you look when walking on stairs? Insights from a dual-task study
dc.typeArticle
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMiyasike-daSilva V, McIlroy WE (2012) Does It Really Matter Where You Look When Walking on Stairs? Insights from a Dual-Task Study. PLoS ONE 7(9): e44722. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044722
uws.contributor.affiliation1Faculty of Health
uws.contributor.affiliation2Kinesiology and Health Sciences
uws.peerReviewStatusReviewed
uws.scholarLevelFaculty
uws.typeOfResourceTexten

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
file - 2026-06-17T101414.769.pdf
Size:
410.81 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
4.47 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: