Does it really matter where you look when walking on stairs? Insights from a dual-task study
| dc.contributor.author | Miyasike-daSilva, Veronica | |
| dc.contributor.author | McIlroy, William E. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-06-18T13:35:29Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-06-18T13:35:29Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2012-09-06 | |
| dc.description | © Miyasike-daSilva, McIlroy. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. | |
| dc.description.abstract | Although the visual system is known to provide relevant information to guide stair locomotion, there is less understanding of the specific contributions of foveal and peripheral visual field information. The present study investigated the specific role of foveal vision during stair locomotion and ground-stairs transitions by using a dual-task paradigm to influence the ability to rely on foveal vision. Fifteen healthy adults (26.9±3.3 years; 8 females) ascended a 7-step staircase under four conditions: no secondary tasks (CONTROL); gaze fixation on a fixed target located at the end of the pathway (TARGET); visual reaction time task (VRT); and auditory reaction time task (ART). Gaze fixations towards stair features were significantly reduced in TARGET and VRT compared to CONTROL and ART. Despite the reduced fixations, participants were able to successfully ascend stairs and rarely used the handrail. Step time was increased during VRT compared to CONTROL in most stair steps. Navigating on the transition steps did not require more gaze fixations than the middle steps. However, reaction time tended to increase during locomotion on transitions suggesting additional executive demands during this phase. These findings suggest that foveal vision may not be an essential source of visual information regarding stair features to guide stair walking, despite the unique control challenges at transition phases as highlighted by phase-specific challenges in dual-tasking. Instead, the tendency to look at the steps in usual conditions likely provides a stable reference frame for extraction of visual information regarding step features from the entire visual field. | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) || CAPES Foundation, Ministry of Education of Brazil. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044722 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10012/23639 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Public Library of Science | |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | PLoS ONE; 7(9); e44722 | |
| dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | en |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
| dc.subject | walking | |
| dc.subject | reaction time | |
| dc.subject | attention | |
| dc.subject | biological locomotion | |
| dc.subject | vision | |
| dc.subject | analysis of variance | |
| dc.subject | eye movements | |
| dc.subject | visual system | |
| dc.title | Does it really matter where you look when walking on stairs? Insights from a dual-task study | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Miyasike-daSilva V, McIlroy WE (2012) Does It Really Matter Where You Look When Walking on Stairs? Insights from a Dual-Task Study. PLoS ONE 7(9): e44722. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044722 | |
| uws.contributor.affiliation1 | Faculty of Health | |
| uws.contributor.affiliation2 | Kinesiology and Health Sciences | |
| uws.peerReviewStatus | Reviewed | |
| uws.scholarLevel | Faculty | |
| uws.typeOfResource | Text | en |